Wednesday, August 21, 2013

Superman Examined

Every so often, Hollywood decides that the world needs another Superman movie. They announce that something is in the works, the public gets a little excited, and then everyone hypes a movie they know very little about. In the end, the result is an okay movie that doesn’t do anything except update the originals with graphics and attempt to make Superman appeal to the public. I am here to argue that Hollywood fails in the latter.

Let me just say that I think Superman is neat. Depending on the era he was written in, he could fly, shoot lasers, use x-ray vision, and ignore bullets to the face. He was pretty awesome to me when I was younger. I loved the first two Superman movies with Christopher Reeves. Supes 3 and 4 were a tad bit unnecessary. Furthermore, I believe that Man of Steel and Superman Returns attempted to create something new for Superman. They attempted to some degree, but they failed to another degree. These movies did not fail because of horrible stories, terrible acting, or bad CGI. These movies failed because Hollywood does not understand the truth about Superman. While he is an important addition to the DC Universe, Superman can never have a truly good movie made about him because he is, for a lack of a better word, boring.

Superman has all of these powers, a fantastic backstory, strong morals, and reasons to fight. But this Kryptonian is boring for two reasons. In any Hollywood movie, you need to give the main character an edge. This character has to be good but with some flaws. This description does not match Superman. If you give him flaws, he ceases to be Superman, and starts being a generic superhero. In a way this can be attributed to early writers who wanted to make him as awesome as possible. But this character simply isn’t appealing anymore. The other reason Supes is boring is because everybody needs a weakness, and this weakness has to be legitimate. Some characters have multiple weaknesses, and this is good as long as it doesn’t make their character seem like a helpless loser. Superman has only one weakness: Kryptonite. Unfortunately, this one weakness is used repeatedly in the same way and turns him into a helpless loser. Think about it this way: When you take Bruce Wayne’s money away, he can still do Batman stuff. But when you toss some Kryptonite at Superman, he weakens. He stops being Superman. His morals mean nothing because what use are they if you have no powers to enforce them. By having Superman be weakened by Kryptonite and making him almost too perfect, you make Superman into a character that no one can really root for because we always know he wins in the end.

On the other hand, maybe this isn’t all the writers’ fault. Perhaps the people to blame are the viewer’s themselves. I am going to posit the belief that the reason Superman seems so boring is because we cannot identify with him. Everyone loves Batman (as indicated by his movies), Iron Man is pretty cool, and Spider-Man is clearly a favorite to many. What do all of these characters have in common? They are all human. More importantly, all of these characters are flawed humans that viewers can identify with. In the comics, Iron Man had a drinking problem, but he still did great things. Batman has parental issues but this does not stop him from scaring criminals. Spider-Man let his Uncle die by accident, but he still fights the good fight. I argue that these superheroes (and others) are favorites because they are humans that viewers can identify with. Viewers love watching these heroes because they represent that even though humanity has problems and flaws, they still have the capacity for good. Viewers can’t see this in Superman movies because Superman is too perfect. He’s a space alien with one weakness to Kryptonite. People can’t identify with a space alien, and they will never be able to be as perfect as he is. In the end, we find his movies boring because there is nothing that connects us to him.


And this is why I’ll be rooting for Batman in any Superman vs Batman movie. But this is just me. Let me know if you think I’m wrong or super wrong. 

Thursday, August 1, 2013

If You Could Have a Theme Song...

So I haven’t really updated my blog all summer. It’s been a wacky summer, and I just haven’t gotten around to it. Luckily, I am back with my random thoughts concerning cheesecake, superheroes, and lists.

Have you ever wanted to walk in a room and have a song announce your presence? Have you ever wanted to make mundane tasks like brushing your teeth, eating breakfast, or doing the dishes? I know I have. This is why I believe life would be much cooler if I had a theme song. Just like certain baseball players, pro wrestlers, and late night talk show hosts, I want something that says “Sebastian has arrived, motherhuggers.” Not just that, but I want a theme song that plays when I start doing boring tasks to enhance those tasks. Doing boring math homework? How about we incorporate the theme song from the Elder Scrolls while you Fus Roh Do those complex equations? Balancing your checkbook? Enhance this task while Kid Rock’s “Cowboy” plays for you. If these songs don’t tickle your fancy, there are a plethora of others that you could use as your theme. Or you could create your own.

As for me, I’m thinking that something Daft Punk mixed with Metallica’s “Enter Sandman” would be a pretty awesome combination that would make a fantastic theme. However, since such as combination does not exist…yet, I’m going to have to say that my theme would be Chayanne’s “Torero.” Yes, the song is in Spanish (We listened to the song my sophomore year in high school, so I know most of the lyrics), but I feel this is the song that I want to announce my presence.




However, this is just me. What song do you want to claim as yours?